Tractatenblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden
| Datum publicatie | Organisatie | Jaargang en nummer | Rubriek | Datum totstandkoming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken | Tractatenblad 2007, 84 | Verdrag |
Authentieke versie (PDF)
Informatie
Gerelateerd
Printen
Delen
A. TITEL
Tweede Protocol bij het Haags Verdrag van 1954 inzake de bescherming van culturele goederen in geval van een gewapend conflict;
’s-Gravenhage, 26 maart 1999
B. TEKST
De Engelse en de Franse tekst van het Protocol zijn geplaatst in Trb. 1999, 107.
C. VERTALING
Zie Trb. 2005, 279.
Op blz. 7 van dat Tractatenblad dient in artikel 11, negende lid, eerste regel, het woord „partij’’ te worden vervangen door „Partij’’.
In de derde regel van hetzelfde negende lid dient het woord „toezicht’’ te worden geschrapt.
Op blz. 20 van dat Tractatenblad dient in artikel 40 de datum „26 mei 1999’’ te worden vervangen door „26 maart 1999’’.
D. PARLEMENT
Bij brieven van 21 november 2006 (Kamerstukken II 2006/2007, 30 894, nr. 1) is het Protocol in overeenstemming met artikel 2, eerste lid, en artikel 5, eerste lid, van de Rijkswet goedkeuring en bekendmaking verdragen overgelegd aan de Eerste en de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal.
De toelichtende nota die de brieven vergezelde, is ondertekend door de Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken B. R. BOT, de Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap M. J. A. VAN DER HOEVEN, de Minister van Defensie H. G. J. KAMP en de Minister van Justitie E. M. H. HIRSCH BALLIN.
De goedkeuring door de Staten-Generaal is verleend op 29 december 2006.
E. PARTIJGEGEVENS
Zie Trb. 1999, 107.
| Partij | Onder-tekening | Ratificatie | Type1) | Inwerking | Opzegging | Buitenwerking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albanië | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Argentinië | 07-01-02 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Armenië | 22-10-99 | 18-05-06 | R | 18-08-06 | ||
| Azerbeidzjan | 17-04-01 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Belarus | 17-12-99 | 13-12-00 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| België | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Brazilië | 23-09-05 | T | 23-12-05 | |||
| Bulgarije | 15-09-99 | 14-06-00 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Cambodja | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Canada | 29-11-05 | T | 28-02-06 | |||
| Colombia | 31-12-99 | |||||
| Costa Rica | 09-12-03 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Cyprus | 19-08-99 | 16-05-01 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Duitsland | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Ecuador | 29-12-99 | 02-08-04 | R | 02-11-04 | ||
| Egypte | 29-12-99 | 03-08-05 | R | 03-11-05 | ||
| El Salvador | 27-03-02 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Equatoriaal Guinee | 19-11-03 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Estland | 17-05-99 | 17-01-05 | R | 17-04-05 | ||
| Finland | 17-05-99 | 27-08-04 | R | 27-11-04 | ||
| Gabon | 29-08-03 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Ghana | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Griekenland | 17-05-99 | 20-04-05 | R | 20-07-05 | ||
| Guatemala | 04-02-05 | T | 04-05-05 | |||
| Heilige Stoel | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Honduras | 26-01-03 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Hongarije | 17-05-99 | 26-10-05 | R | 26-01-06 | ||
| Indonesië | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Iran | 24-05-05 | T | 24-08-05 | |||
| Italië | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Ivoorkust | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Jemen | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Kroatië | 17-05-99 | 08-02-06 | R | 08-05-06 | ||
| Libië | 20-07-01 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Litouwen | 13-03-02 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Luxemburg | 17-05-99 | 30-06-05 | R | 30-09-05 | ||
| Macedonië, Voormalige Joegoslavische Republiek | 17-05-99 | 19-04-02 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Madagascar | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Marokko | 21-12-99 | |||||
| Mexico | 07-10-03 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der | 17-05-99 | |||||
| – Nederland | 30-01-07 | R | 30-04-07 | |||
| – Ned. Antillen | - | - | ||||
| – Aruba | - | - | ||||
| Nicaragua | 01-06-01 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Niger | 16-06-06 | T | 16-09-06 | |||
| Nigeria | 17-05-99 | 21-10-05 | R | 21-01-06 | ||
| Oman | 30-06-99 | |||||
| Oostenrijk | 17-05-99 | 01-03-02 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Pakistan | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Panama | 08-03-01 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Paraguay | 09-11-04 | T | 09-02-05 | |||
| Peru | 13-07-99 | 24-05-05 | R | 24-08-05 | ||
| Qatar | 17-05-99 | 04-09-00 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Roemenië | 08-11-99 | 07-08-06 | R | 07-11-06 | ||
| Servië | 02-09-02 | T | 09-03-04 | |||
| Slovenië | 13-04-04 | T | 13-07-04 | |||
| Slowakije | 22-12-99 | 11-02-04 | R | 11-05-04 | ||
| Spanje | 17-05-99 | 06-07-01 | R | 09-03-04 | ||
| Syrië | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Tadzjikistan | 21-02-06 | T | 21-05-06 | |||
| Uruguay | 03-01-07 | T | 03-04-07 | |||
| Zweden | 17-05-99 | |||||
| Zwitserland | 17-05-99 | 09-07-04 | R | 09-10-04 |
*) O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie, R= Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving, T=Toetreding, VG=Voortgezette gebondenheid, NB=Niet bekend
Uitbreidingen
Verklaringen, voorbehouden en bezwaren
Azerbeidzjan, 17 april 2001
The Republic of Azerbaijan declares that under the definition of ‘‘the competent national authorities of the occupied territory’’ mentioned in Article 9, paragraph 2 of the Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, it understands the central competent authority dealing with the issues on the protection of the cultural properties situated over the whole territory of the Party to the Protocol.
België, 17 mei 1999
This signature is also binding on the French Community, the German-speaking Community, the Walloon Region and the Brussels-Capitol Region.
This signature is also binding on the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region.
Canada, 29 november 2005
Statement of Understanding
1. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that the definition of a military objective in Article 2(f) is to be interpreted the same way as Article 52(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
2. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that in relation to Article 6(a)(ii), 6(b), 7(a), 7(b), 8, 13(2)(a) and 13(2)(b) the word ‘‘feasible’’ means that which is practicable or practically possible, taking into account all circumstances ruling at the time, including humanitarian and military considerations.
3. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that in relation to Article 6(a)(ii), 6(b), 7(c) and 7(d)(ii) that the military advantage anticipated from an attack is intended to refer to the advantage anticipated from the attack considered as a whole and not from isolated or particular parts of the attack.
4. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that any cultural property that becomes a military objective may be attacked in accordance with a waiver of imperative military necessity pursuant 10 Article 4(2) of the Convention.
5. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that a decision to invoke imperative military necessity pursuant to Article 6(c) of this Protocol may be taken by an officer commanding a force smaller than the equivalent of a battalion in size in circumstances where the cultural property becomes a military objective and the circumstances ruling at the time relating to force protection are such that it is not feasible to require the decision to be made by an officer commanding a force the equivalent of a battalion in size or larger.
6. It is the understanding of the Government of Canada that under Article 6(a)(i), cultural property can be made into a military objective because of its nature, location, purpose or use.
Iran, 24 mei 2005
Accession of the Islamic Republic of Iran to this Protocol shall not mean the recognition of any country it does not recognize, neither shall it give rise to any commitment toward such states or governments. Explanatory declaration
Considering the special importance of protecting cultural heritage of nations against damages caused by war,
Bearing in mind the fact that cultural heritage of nations is deemed as part of cultural heritage of humanity,
Considering that full protect of cultural heritage against damages caused by armed conflicts needs the protections more than that which is provided for in the present Protocol,
The Islamic Republic of Iran regards the conclusion of bilateral and multilateral supplementary agreements to the present Protocol as necessary and states its readiness to conclude such agreements. These agreements shall entail the granting of privileges and providing more possibilities for protection of cultural heritage of nations and shall also articulate the rules stipulated in the Protocol including customary rules of international law, in a way that solely include the rules that are not protested by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and as well as explain more clearly the modality for the implementation of provisions of section 4 of this Protocol.
Oostenrijk, 1 maart 2002
Concerning Article 15 sub-paragraph 1 (c):
The Republic of Austria considers that the term ‘‘appropriation’’ refers to the offence of (grave) theft as set forth in §§ 127 and 128 sub-paragraph 1 (3) of the Austrian Criminal code (österreichisches Strafgesetzbuch - StGB).
Concerning Article 16 sub-paragraph 1 (c):
The Republic of Austria considers with regard to the provision of Article 17 paragraph 1 that the obligation under Article 16 sub-paragraph 1 (c) to establish jurisdiction over the serious violations set forth in Article 15 sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) only applies to such cases where the alleged offender cannot be extradited (aut dedere aut judicare).
G. INWERKINGTREDING
Zie Trb. 2005, 279.
Het Protocol is ingevolge artikel 43, tweede lid, voor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden op 30 april 2007 in werking getreden.
Wat betreft het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, geldt het Protocol alleen voor Nederland.
J. VERWIJZINGEN
Zie Trb. 1999, 107 en Trb. 2005, 279.
| Titel | : | Handvest van de Verenigde Naties; San Francisco, 26 juni 1945 |
| Laatste Trb. | : | Trb. 2007, 50 |
Permanente link
Kopieer de link naar uw clipboard
https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/trb-2007-84.html